Posts Tagged ‘Tax Department’

Audit Urges State Tax Department To Use Risk Assessment To Pick Businesses For Compliance

By Sean Whaley | 3:21 pm May 1st, 2012

CARSON CITY – Nevada’s Tax Department could enhance its audit efforts by adhering to its own risk assessment formula for determining which businesses to review for compliance, an audit released today said.

The audit of the agency by the state Division of Internal Audits found that it does not follow its risk assessment results when determining which businesses to analyze for potential tax collections.

“Review of the sales tax audits performed in calendar year 2010 revealed the department only selected a few of the businesses it deemed to be the highest risk,” the report said.

The audit found that Tax Department staff rely instead on a supervisor’s judgment of which businesses to review. The agency also performs smaller audits to ensure a high number of reviews.

“Using the audit supervisor’s judgment and pursuing smaller audits negates the use of risk assessment when selecting audits,” the review said.

The audit also recommended that the agency consider reallocating its audit staff after updating its risk assessment process.

The audit of the agency was reviewed today by the Executive Branch Audit Committee.

William Chisel, executive director of the Department of Taxation, accepted all of the audit recommendations. Chisel took over the agency in September after serving as chief of internal audits.

Tax Department chief William Chisel. / Nevada News Bureau file photo.

“We’re moving forward on the risk assessment, which has already been implemented,” he said. “As far as resources to implement the collections process, that’s going to be done through internal resources, in other words we’re going to amend our current computer system to address the changes that we need to redesign our collection process.

“Hopefully this will help us maximize our resources, and I think that is what we’re going to get out of this,” Chisel said.

Internal auditors said that a survey of six other states showed they all use risk assessments to select sales tax audits. A 2004 audit of the agency found that Michigan increased its violation findings by 10 percent after converting to a method of selecting taxpayer audits based on risk.

“The department should emphasize the amount of taxable sales as the primary risk component when selecting audits,” the review said. “As taxable sales increase, so does the number of errors in dollars reported. However, our review of Nevada’s audits based on taxable sales shows it has not emphasized higher taxable sales when selecting audits.”

-

Audio clip:

Tax Department Director William Chisel says the audit recommendations are being implemented:

050112Chisel :22 our collection process.”

 

 

 

State Tax Department Seeks Funding To Monitor Cigarette Sales To Protect Nevada’s Tobacco Payments

By Sean Whaley | 2:16 pm January 10th, 2012

CARSON CITY – A state panel today supported a request from the Department of Taxation for $260,000 to hire a team of auditors to track cigarette sales to protect a $40 million a year payment to Nevada from the nation’s major tobacco companies.

As much as $360 million paid to the state beginning in 2003 is at risk as Nevada engages in arbitration over the annual payments made by the nation’s major tobacco companies as part of the 1998 Master Settlement Agreement (MSA), said William Chisel, director of the Tax Department.

William Chisel, director of the state Tax Department, testifies today at the Board of Examiners meeting. / Photo: Nevada News Bureau.

“The stakes for the arbitration are high,” he said. “The risk of losing substantial amounts of money increases over the years if we do not institute this team.”

The tobacco payments help fund the Gov. Kenny Guinn Millennium Scholarship for eligible Nevada high school graduates, among other programs.

The Board of Examiners, made up of Gov. Brian Sandoval, Attorney General Catherine Cortez Masto and Secretary of State Ross Miller, approved the request for the funding from the Legislature’s contingency fund to establish the three-person enforcement unit. Masto was not present for the meeting.

Lawmakers who serve on the Senate and Assembly money committees will meet as the Interim Finance Committee Feb. 9 to consider the request.

Sandoval asked Chisel if the request should have been submitted to the 2011 Legislature so tobacco funding could have been used to fund the unit. The attorney general’s office said the funding from the master settlement agreement has historically funded its oversight of the tobacco agreement, but that the Tax Department has not been funded in this way.

Sandoval said the enforcement unit costs should be built into the next budget with tobacco funds identified as the funding source.

Chisel said it is important for the state to monitor the sales of cigarettes by the smaller tobacco companies that are not part of a master settlement agreement.

As part of the MSA, there is a requirement that these smaller companies set aside a portion of their tobacco sales in an escrow account in an amount proportionate to the payments made to the state by the major tobacco companies. The MSA provides for a reduction of the required annual payments by the major tobacco companies to any state which fails to adequately enforce these laws in a particular calendar year.

Chisel said the team will work to protect the payments that have already been made to the state.

“Well, we’re in arbitration right now with the big tobacco companies and our concern is that we want to track these nonparticipating manufacturers, the ones that did not get involved with the MSA,” he said. “We’re responsible to make sure that they pay into an escrow account of two cents per cigarette. At stake is the $40 million we get each year for the MSA payment.”

Nevada has not tracked these sales and payments before, and doing so would lessen the risk of losing any portion of the MSA payments in the arbitration process, Chisel said.

-

Audio clips:

William Chisel, director of the state Tax Department, says the state needs to keep track of cigarette sales by companies not participating in the tobacco settlement agreement:

011012Chisel1 :18 cents per cigarette.”

Chisel says at stake is the $40 million annual payment as a result of the MSA:

011012Chisel2 :05 the MSA payment.”

Chisel says the participating tobacco companies want the state to monitor compliance by nonparticipating manufacturers:

011012Chisel3 :10 monitoring these NPMs.”