Tarkanian acknowledges that his mother was a Democrat (which means Tarkanians contributed to the Democrats also). Again – we are in different times. While in his coaching career, Tark denied NCAA allegations that he turned a blind eye to academic fraud in the case of a former statistician who admitted to completing coursework for several Fresno State players. Fresno State, however, admitted to academic fraud and imposed penalties.

Lowden is a proven leader with a track record of success, who has earned every opportunity she has had. Many don’t realize that Sue is the daughter of a former coal miner. She and her husband both come from humble backgrounds but have succeeded in business.

Anyone who doesn’t think Sue Lowden is a solid conservative doesn’t know her.

Angle has the scientology rumors following her career and will most likely not win over the Las Vegas Area (even with the National Tea Party Endorsement – not to be confused with the other 8-10 other Tea Parties in NV).

No candidate is perfect, but all three are conservative enough to bring about the change required in Washington and dethrone Harry. My vote will go to Sue.

Steve, only one will win the primary. I highly doubt the loser will run independent. That will be the only way to split the conservative vote.

tbag is obviously a lib..

As far as 2012…The Republican party needs to do what is in the best interest of the country and elect Ron Paul. Paul can beat Obama.

excellent point about chachas. he did come across the best in the debate. problem is, he’s a carpetbagger. period. nevada doesn’t take kindly to carpetbaggers (paging jack carter and tessa hafen) and all of his money and billboards hasn’t moved the peg one bit. he’s a distraction. that’s it. personally, i would like to see chachas run again in 2012.

It is also boggles my mind that in order to be a candidate for a party, you believe a person must have NEVER supported a candidate from another party. Nor do you believe a person can change their views like things on abortion. Well guess what, I once supported and voted for a democrat, and once was pro choice. Although a republican, I may one day in the future, support a democrat for office. I am now pro life, and have given lots of money to the NRLC to make retribution for my past sins. I better not run for office as a republican with a pro life platform than, huh?

Now let’s take the candidates. I heard the top three speak (Sue, Sharron and Danny) in person before I made my decisions to support Sue. She was the one that seemed less like she needed the job, but wanted it the most in order to help NV. I did like Sharron Angle, but when her entire speech was about her past in the legislator, and how she did a lot for home school, I was left waiting for something else, but never got it. Also, when you mention the word “Constitution” 25 times in a 10 min. speech, it begins to sound like rhetoric, and I am a Constitutionalist. Danny just didn’t do it for me at all.

Now we all know Sue has the best chance to defeat Dirty Harry, and every poll to date, including this one, shows it. And PLEASE do not bring up straw polls. People only bring them up when they are grasping at “straws”. Anyone who knows anything about the 2008 election, knows that Ron Paul when almost every “straw poll” there was, his followers were saying the same thing Sharron’s followers are saying now, and he got destroyed. Straw polls really mean nothing.

If you truly want Harry Reid gone, and someone in Washington who will help NV and create jobs, vote for Sue Lowden.

GO SUE!