Wowza: US Senate Candidate Scott Ashjian Files Pubic Integrity Unit and Bar Complaint Against Deputy DA Bernie Zadrowski, Says Media “Defamed” Him, Tells FBI His Famliy Subject to “Numerous Threats,” Wants Feds to Probe “Voter Intimdiation, Defamation and Extortion”

What a fun headline. The fallout from this may not be so fun, though, if any of Ashjian’s claims and complaints are proven out.

As Flashed by Ralston just now:

In one of the more amazing news releases I have seen in a political campaign, Tea Party of Nevada U.S. Senate hopeful Scott Ashjian says he has filed a bar complaint against Deputy DA Bernie Zadrowski, a former Clark County GOP chairman, saying he wrongly went after him on false bad check charges. Ashjian also said news outlets that reported an arrest warrant was issued defamed him and he also said he has gone to the FBI to report “numerous threats” against himself, his family and TPN members. He wants the feds to probe “voter intimdiation, defamation and extortion.”

And this: “I consider this entire affair (the bad check charges) to be part of a wider effort to discredit my candidacy and the Tea Party of Nevada, to the detriment of a fair and open elections process.”

Wow.

This will cement in the minds of some folks that Ashjian is a kook. But if he can prove what he says, watch out.

Here is the release (compliments of Ralston’s blog):  ashjian_release_Apr_2

Among other things, Ashjian says the $5,000 “bounced check” reported by the media was in fact a stopped payment to a contractor he discovered was not legal to do business in the state.

Says, also, he intends to “vigorously defend my right to run for office despite the threats, false charges, political retaliation and attempts to challenge my candidacy.”

  • http://nevadapoliticsmatters.blogspot.com/ Ned Barnett

    Let me get this straight.

    AFTER he paid the bad check and all the associated legal fees, as reported in the mainstream media the other day, Scott says that it wasn’t a bad check at all.

    Now, let me get this straight. A normal person would only pay a bad check if it was, indeed, a bad check.

    A normal person would never pay fines and fees and such related to a bad check IF the check wasn’t bad.

    A normal person would defend himself and his credibility – and hey, it is incredibly easy to prove that a check wasn’t “bad,” but was “stopped payment” (although stopping payment can be fraudulent, as I’ve learned when I had a check stopped in a fraudulent way – I expect to win that in short order, and also expect to see the check-stopper in prison stripes).

    So, let’s see.

    Scott admitted to the check’s being bad.

    Scott paid the bad check, along with lots of fines, in order to avoid prosecution.

    Then, after admitting it was a bad check and paying the fines to avoid prosecution, Scott claims with no apparent proof that:

    a. It wasn’t a bad check after all; and,

    b. That evil district attorney was out to get him.

    OK, let’s add it up and …

    Sorry, Scott, this makes no more sense than your claim to be the legitimate representative of the Tea Party movement in Nevada, a movement who’s never heard from you, never saw you participating (except for that one photoshopped photo), and wants nothing to do with you and your MoveOn.Org campaign chairman, Barry Levinson.

    Or so it seems to me. Ain’t free speech, free press, logic and facts wonderful things? You Betcha!

    Ned Barnett