Archive for January, 2010

Political Round Up

By Elizabeth Crum | 8:02 am January 27th, 2010

Yesterday was an unusually busy here at the Bureau, so I was unable to post a number of interesting political tidbits.  Here are some snippets and links to catch you up:

– Lieutenant Governor Brian Krolicki was in D.C. yesterday for a meeting with the NRSC (among others) re: a possible U.S. Senate run.  Politico reported on Monday that a run was in doubt, but if Krolicki received encouragement from NRSC chair, John Cornyn (R-TX), it could happen.  If Krolicki enters the race, that’ll make an even dozen contenders in the GOP field.

– Sources back east tell me that because Krolicki has the support of Senator McCain (who is rather unpopular with the stauncher conservative factions of his own party), there is talk about the possibility that another prominent senator might endorse a non-Krolicki candidate in the GOP primary race should Krolicki decide to jump in.  The NRSC has vowed to stay neutral in the primary, but in light of the NRSC’s recent PR problems with the conservative base (see here and here and here) the support of an influential senator could be just as good (better?) for a GOP hopeful.

– U.S. Senate candidate Sue Lowden yesterday announced an economic recovery plan for Nevada.  Includes tax relief, proposals for job creation and a call for transparency in government spending.

– Reno Mayor Bob Cashell endorsed Brian Sandoval for governor.

– Anjeanette Damon reported that Nevada’s stimulus website is now ranked 25th in the nation, a big improvement over its previous spot (bottom five).  However, we still earned just 42 points out of 100 on the quantity and quality of info on how we’re spending our stimulus dollars.  You can view Nevada’s (or any other state’s) report here.

– Nevadans for Sensible Marijuana Laws unveiled a new ad that asks Washoe County District Attorney Richard Gammick why he is against ending Nevada’s prohibition on marijuana. The ad will air today on KRNV in Reno.

Nevada November Taxable Sales Down Double Digits But Improve Over Prior Months

By Sean Whaley | 12:59 pm January 26th, 2010

CARSON CITY – Nevada’s taxable sales fell by 10.9 percent in November 2009 over the same month in 2008, making it the 13th month of double-digit declines in economic activity in the state. The $3 billion in goods sold in Nevada in November brought the fiscal year to date taxable sales decline to 18.1 percent.

In what might be a sign of improvement, the decline was lower than the 17.8 percent decline in October, and a 17.7 percent decline in September, according to the release by the Nevada Department of Taxation.

Gov. Jim Gibbons said: “The release of taxable sales and revenue collection data for the month of November indicates that, although revenues continue to decline in light of the sustained weakness in the housing and job markets, the pace has slowed.  The administration continues to search for ways to save money, reduce spending, and promote efficiencies in government.”

All major taxable sales categories except clothing and accessories stores, up 2.7 percent, were down in November 2009 compared to November 2008. But some of the declines were more modest than in previous months. Home furniture and furnishings were off by 1.4 percent, while general merchandise stores were off by 1.5 percent.

The largest categories continue to show a state economy that is in a protracted slowdown, however.  Motor vehicle and parts dealers were down 9.3 percent, bars and restaurants were down 10 percent, the construction industry classification was off by 44.6 percent and merchant wholesalers-durable goods were off 30.2 percent.

Thirteen of Nevada’s 17 counties recorded a decrease in taxable sales for November 2009 compared to November 2008. Only Humboldt, Lincoln, Mineral and Nye counties recorded positive taxable sales for the period.

The taxes generated by the sale of goods are a major source of revenue for the state budget. In part because of the continued slump in taxable sales, Gov. Jim Gibbons and the Nevada Legislature face a $1 billion shortfall in the current two-year budget that will require major cuts to programs and services. A special session of the Legislature to deal with the shortfall is expected in late February or early March.

The 2009-2011 budget was balanced by the Legislature using the assumption that taxable sales would decline by an average of 4.9 percent this year and grow by 2.1 percent in the fiscal year that begins July 1.

But on Friday, those estimates were revised downward to reflect an average 13.4 percent decline this year and a 4.7 percent decline next year. The difference is nearly a $183 million shortfall in this state budget revenue source alone. Assumptions for other major tax revenues were lowered as well.

Dino DiCianno, executive director of the Tax Department, said Friday during a hearing on the new revenue estimates that Nevada has a long way to go to get out of the current slump.

“I do see some glimmer of hope; there are certain sectors within the economy in this state that are starting to rebound,” he said. “But the problem is, without construction, which is a major driver, and without automobile dealerships selling cars, we’ve got a long ways to go folks, a long ways to go.”

Data from Nevada Department of Taxation

Prognoses for Harry Reid

By Elizabeth Crum | 12:05 pm January 26th, 2010

Check out the chart notes from the latest exams of Harry Reid’s chances in November:  Chris Cillizza at The Fix, Anna Mulrine at US News and World Report, the much talked about poll at Daily Kos, Reid Wilson at National Journal‘s Hotline and Jenn Rubin at Contentions.

Political Handicapper Charlie Cooked Moves NV-3 to “Toss Up”

By Elizabeth Crum | 3:50 pm January 25th, 2010

Political Handicapper Charlie Cook today updated the NV-3 race to a “toss up.”  Bad news for first term Democratic congresswoman Dina Titus, good news for GOP challengers Joe Heck or Rob Lauer.

Stand by for comments and updates (which I will post here).

Las Vegas Mayor Oscar Goodman Will Not Run for Governor

By Elizabeth Crum | 3:24 pm January 25th, 2010

It’s a sad fact that in punditry and politics, all speculation must eventually come to an end.  Though Las Vegas Oscar Goodman invited and ignited much conjecture about his possible gubernatorial run through a series of public and private statements over the last nine months, today he pulled the plug on the guessing game.

As first broken by Las Vegas Sun columnist Jon Ralston from his @RalstonFlash Twitter account at 12:13 p.m. today, sources in Goodman’s office said he was going to announce he would not be running for governor.  And at his 2:00 p.m. press conference from City Hall, Goodman did just that.

Goodman, a former Democrat, had changed his party affiliation to non-partisan in December in a move that left many wondering if he was indeed serious about jumping in the race.  A Nevada News Bureau poll done in late November showed Goodman would have pulled more support from Democrat Rory Reid than from Republican Brian Sandoval in a three-way match up.

So what will Goodman do when his mayoral time is up in 15 months?  Las Vegas CityLife editor @SteveSebelius ReTweeted my query and started a new subject for speculation today at 12:18:

RT @elizcrum: So… If not a run for gov, what WILL Goodman do after his term is up? // Serve as First Gentleman to Mayor CAROLYN Goodman!

Gibbons to Address Nevadans, Call Legislature into Special Session in Response to $1 Billion State Budget Crisis

By Sean Whaley | 11:40 am January 25th, 2010

(updated at 1:36 p.m. on Jan. 25, 2010)

CARSON CITY – Gov. Jim Gibbons said today he will deliver a special State of the State address to Nevadans on Feb. 8 at 6 p.m. to discuss Nevada’s budget crisis. He will also announce his intention to call the Legislature into special session to deal with a budget shortfall that is now over $1 billion dollars.

“Just like families all across Nevada suffering to make ends meet, state government must live within its means,” Gibbons said. “It is irresponsible to spend money we don’t have; the state simply must reduce spending. The time for legislative hearings and other delays has long since past; it is time for decisive action and that is what I plan to do.”

A special session, which could last several days, is likely for late February or early March, said Gibbons spokesman Dan Burns.

The State Economic Forum on Friday projected Nevada will have $580 million less in major tax revenues in the current two-year budget than what was approved by the Legislature last year. The state’s obligation to maintain funding levels for public education will mean $200 million more Gibbons and the Legislature will have to cut or find to balance the budget. There is also $230 million in additional Medicaid spending that has to be included in the total shortfall, bringing it to just over $1 billion.

“Citizens deserve to be informed and be a part of the solution to the problems our state is facing,” Gibbons said.

Only the governor can call a special session. The governor can also limit the discussion in a special session to a specific agenda.

Gibbons said meetings and discussions are being held to determine what legislation will be considered during the special session. Everything from reduced operating hours at certain government agencies, to education reform, to creating new revenue from waste recycling programs, is being considered.

State agency directors are meeting with the state Budget Office all this week to go over what programs and services can be cut to help balance the budget. Once those cuts are tallied, Gibbons will look to other alternatives to bring the budget into balance.

Gibbons has proposed eliminating mandates for all-day kindergarten and class-size reduction in the lower elementary grades as part of a budget-balancing plan. So far lawmakers have rejected such proposals for a special session, saying the budget shortfall needs to be addressed quickly and is not the time for a complex policy debate.

The Legislature will be asked by Gibbons to repeal a current Nevada law that makes the state ineligible to compete for federal school improvement funds so the state can apply for up to $170 million in one-time grants by a June deadline.

The size of the hole Nevada is facing in the current budget, which runs through June 30, 2011, makes layoffs of state employees a real possibility along with potential salary cuts and other drastic measures.

The state has thus far avoided laying off workers, while local governments have implemented some layoffs because of lower than projected tax revenues. Clark County laid off 67 workers, mostly building inspectors, earlier this month. The private sector has not been so fortunate.

Over the past two years, state government employment has stayed relatively stable, having only 100 fewer employees in December 2009 than two years prior, a decrease of only three-tenths of a percent, according to jobs data issued by the Nevada Department of Employment, Training and Rehabilitation. Employment by Nevada’s local governments, meanwhile, has dropped by 4.8 percent, with 5,100 fewer employees in December 2009 than in December 2007, when the state’s economic slowdown began.  Over the same time period, total employment in the private sector has dropped by 7.3 percent, losing a total of 81,300 jobs.

Local and State employment data from detr.state.nv.us

Senate Ethics Committee to Investigate Ensign Despite DOJ Probe

By Elizabeth Crum | 10:10 am January 25th, 2010

Politico this morning reported that the Department of Justice probe into the aftermath of Senator John Ensign’s affair with an ex-staffer will not prevent the Senate Ethics Committee from pursuing its own investigation.  Said the Politico piece:

Unlike those of its House counterpart, the Senate Ethics Committee’s rules do not formally bar the panel from taking up a case in which the Justice Department or other law enforcement agency is involved. But the Senate committee does traditionally stand aside in such instances.

Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.), chairwoman of the Ethics Committee, declined to comment on the Ensign case. But her Republican counterpart, Sen. Johnny Isakson of Georgia, indicated that the panel was prepared to move forward with its own probe, regardless of involvement by the Justice Department or the FBI.

According to Politico, the committee contacted the DOJ to determine their level of interest in the case:

“My take is that Justice is not thinking this case is going to amount to criminal charges,” said Melanie Sloan, executive director of Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, a watchdog group. “Otherwise, they [might] be a little more worried that statements made to the Ethics Committee would taint their case.”

Stan Brand, a veteran ethics lawyer, said the Justice Department is most likely “informally gathering information” and hasn’t decided yet whether to move forward with a full-blown criminal investigation of Ensign, meaning the Senate Ethics Committee is not interfering with a criminal case by conducting its own probe.

It will be interesting to note not only the outcome but the timing of either a full-blown DOJ investigation or possible sanctions by the ethics committee – and to see whether Republican candidates will choose to distance themselves from Senator Ensign at that time.  Many Nevada candidates for public office have already said they will not be seeking Ensign’s help with their campaigns.

Inaugural Post

By Elizabeth Crum | 6:05 am January 25th, 2010

Welcome to the Nevada News Bureau’s political blog.  It will be lovingly maintained by me, Elizabeth Crum, a longtime political junkie and the manager/editor of this small but merry band of newsies.

I’d like to begin with a respectful nod to the many talented political bloggers around the state.  I look forward to contributing to the conversation in what is shaping up to be a fascinating (and entertaining) year in Nevada politics.

Please stop by often for breaking political news and analysis, links to stories and commentary at other blogs and publications, video and audio goodies, and the occasional amusing anecdote.  In addition, you can follow the News Bureauand me, personally – on Twitter.

That’s it – for the moment.

Thanks for reading and drop me a line (or a hot tip) anytime to:  editor@nevadanewsbureau.com

E.

P.S.  I invite and encourage feedback in the Comments.  Please just keep it civil.  We reserve the right to delete comments or ban commenters who cross the line of decency.

Economic Forum Presents Grim Picture, State Budget Director Says Some Agencies and Programs Will Be Hit Harder Than Others

By Sean Whaley | 10:59 am January 23rd, 2010

CARSON CITY – When the dust settled from the Economic Forum meeting late yesterday, the message was clear: Governor Jim Gibbons and the Nevada Legislature have an enormous challenge to rebalance the state budget – a $580 million challenge that could still get worse.

The five-member forum of private sector financial experts, called together by Gibbons to get its take on the depth of the state’s budget woes, radically lowered its tax revenue estimates for this fiscal year and next.

The result is two years of tax revenues that are 9.2 percent lower than originally projected by the forum last year after $776.3 million in tax increases approved by the 2009 Legislature are factored in. The budget created less than eight months ago using a $6.3 billion revenue estimate will have to see major reductions to come back into balance at a level of $5.7 billion.

The forum heard doom and gloom scenarios – from continued high unemployment, lower gaming revenues and a lagging economic recovery – for much of the day before finally making its projections on 10 major revenue sources.

Other smaller revenue sources will be re-projected by legislative staff, which could affect the final number to a small degree. Required public school funding could add to the total as well since the state is required to make up any shortfalls and much of the public education funding comes from sales taxes, which were significantly reduced in the new forum projections.

Now that the forum’s work is done, the tough job of making the needed cuts gets under way.

A special session is expected to be called by Gibbons for some time in February.

State Budget Director Andrew Clinger said meetings with agency chiefs are scheduled for all of next week to begin the process of deciding what can be cut.

“We will begin making some decisions on what cuts we can accept and those that are not palatable,” he said. “The cuts won’t be across-the-board. Absolutely some agencies will take a greater hit than others.”

When the program cuts are finalized, then Gibbons will look at other alternatives for closing the remainder of the gap, including the possibility of further pay reductions for state employees, Clinger said. No budget cut decisions have yet been finalized, he said.

Gibbons said Thursday he believes a special session of the Legislature is inevitable to deal with the budget cuts. An announcement is expected soon now that the forum estimates are complete.

Gibbons said the session is needed to fix the budget problems created by the Democrat-controlled Legislature, a characterization rejected by Democrat lawmakers.

“I believe the Democrat-controlled Legislature is partly responsible for many of the economic problems our state is facing, but unfortunately, the only way to correct some of their mistakes is to call them together in a special session,” Gibbons said. “All of our economic indicators are pointing toward the need for a special session of the Nevada Legislature.”

Gibbons, who is running for re-election but facing stiff opposition in the GOP primary, blamed legislative Democrats for the current fiscal crisis facing Nevada.

“The Democrat-controlled Legislature raised taxes and increased spending, while I stood by my promise to the voters by vetoing their higher taxes and spending,” he said. “But they wouldn’t listen and now we have to endure the consequences of their actions.”

Gibbons said that during the last legislative session state legislators raised government spending by $1 billion.

“They also raised the payroll and sales taxes, leading to additional layoffs and placing a greater financial burden on Nevada families,” he said. “Today the recession continues and Nevada’s unemployment rate ranks second in the nation.”

Assemblywoman Sheila Leslie, D-Reno, said Gibbons’ comments are designed for campaign purposes and don’t serve to resolve the serious budget problems facing the state.

“The governor is throwing another one of his temper tantrums,” Leslie said. “I’m sure voters know the facts. The entire country is in economic turmoil.”

The modest tax increase approved by a bi-partisan vote in the Legislature is not to blame for the state’s woes, she said.

“It is more complex than that, and the governor knows that as well,” Leslie said. “He is striving for political relevancy by pointing the finger at the opposition party.”

In comments made Thursday on the Nevada Newsmakers program, Assembly Speaker Barbara Buckley, D-Las Vegas, said recent budget meetings with Gibbons have not been fruitful.

“What we hear from the governor in these meetings is, basically, “I’m going to announce a plan in my press conference in 30 minutes,” Buckley said.  “With one recent legislative leadership meeting, he scheduled it after his announcement.  This is not the collaborative approach we need.”

U.S. Supreme Court Opens Up 2010 Elections in Major Free Speech Ruling

By Sean Whaley | 3:41 pm January 21st, 2010

CARSON CITY – Like it or not, the 2010 campaign season is likely to dominate the airwaves more than ever nationally and in Nevada following a decision today by the U.S. Supreme Court repealing a limitation on political spending by corporations.

In what is being hailed by supporters as a major First Amendment free speech ruling, the 5-4 decision will allow corporations and labor unions to spend freely on behalf of political candidates and on political issues. The ruling overturned a key section of the McCain-Feingold Act.

Janine Hansen, executive director of the Independent American Party of Nevada and a lobbyist in Carson City for the party and the Nevada Eagle Forum, welcomed the ruling as a victory for free speech and challengers to the political establishment.

“The more campaign finance laws we have had enacted, the fewer successes challengers and non-incumbents have had,” she said. “Anything we can do to restore free speech is very important.

“These laws are why we have a government that is unresponsive to the will of the people,” Hansen said.

Lee Rowland, northern coordinator for the ACLU of Nevada, also welcomed the ruling, saying the ACLU had filed a “friend of the court” brief with the U.S. Supreme Court challenging the constitutionality of the section of the law repealed in today’s decision.

The case involved a type of speech, called an “electioneering communication” as opposed to limits on the expenditure of money in political races, and was clearly a violation of the First Amendment, she said.

“We are dealing with core political speech,” Rowland said. “It was a very black and white issue to us.”

Rowland said it is too early to know what effect the ruling may have on Nevada’s state campaign finance laws. But the ACLU of Nevada spoke out against a bill in the 2009 session of the Legislature that would have established similar restrictions that Rowland said were also unconstitutional. The changes did not win approval.

“This is precisely the type of core political speech the First Amendment is designed to protect,” she said.

The case arose when a Washington, DC-based conservative nonprofit group called Citizens United, sought to run advertisements for a film called Hillary: The Movie, right before the Democratic presidential primaries in 2008. The ads were rejected by the Federal Election Commission citing limitations on campaign spending under the McCain-Feingold Act.

A lower court found the film’s purpose was political speech, while Citizens United argued the film was nonpartisan and not an electioneering communication.

Today’s U.S. Supreme Court decision overturned the lower court ruling in favor of Citizens United.

Justice Anthony Kennedy, in the majority opinion, said: “Some members of the public might consider Hillary to be insightful and instructive; some might find it to be neither high art nor a fair discussion on how to set the Nation’s course; still others simply might suspend judgment on these points but decide to think more about issues and candidates. Those choices and assessments, however, are not for the Government to make.”

David Bossie, president of Citizens United, called the decision a “complete victory” for the group.

“This is a monumental day for Citizens United,” he said. “So we have been waiting a long time for this day.”

Critics of the decision who are saying it will “shake the core” of our Democracy are guilty of “tremendous hyperbole,” Bossie said. Corporations aren’t all the size of the Exxon Mobile Corp. Some corporations are run by lone individuals, he said.

Not everyone welcomed the ruling. Nationally, two leading national campaign finance reform organizations, Common Cause and Public Campaign, criticized the decision, saying it will “enhance the ability of the deepest-pocketed special interests to influence elections and the U.S. Congress.”

“This decision means more business as usual in Washington, stomping on voters’ hope for change,” said Nick Nyhart, president and CEO of Public Campaign. “Congress must take on the insider Washington money culture if it wants to make the changes voters are demanding.”

Washington, DC, based attorney Tom Josefiak, a former chairman of the Federal Election Commission that was the target in the Citizens United case, called the decision a landmark day for the First Amendment and free speech.

“In issuing its sweeping Citizens United opinion today, the Supreme Court reversed decades of its own precedent prohibiting corporate independent expenditures and recognized once and for all that the First Amendment right of free speech applies to everyone, including corporations,” he said.

Josefiak, who also formerly served as chief counsel for the Republican National Committee, said the ruling allows corporations to spend their funds on political issues as long as they do so independently.

National Democratic Group Questions Nevada GOP Senate Candidates’ Continued Support for Embattled Senator John Ensign

By Sean Whaley | 2:05 pm January 21st, 2010

CARSON CITY – A national Democratic organization is questioning whether two Nevada GOP senate candidates are now distancing themselves from U.S. Sen. John Ensign following the disclosure this week the Republican senator is under FBI investigation following his disclosure last summer of an extramarital affair.

Sue Lowden and Danny Tarkanian have been embattled Senator John Ensign’s number one cheerleaders since he announced his affair last summer,” said Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee National Press Secretary Deirdre Murphy. “With Ensign now under FBI investigation, will Lowden and Tarkanian change their tune and distance themselves from him?”

Both Lowden and Tarkanian are vying to win the Republican primary for the right to face Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., in the November election.

Murphy cited a recent comment by Lowden that it is good the Ensign matter is being investigated. Murphy also noted that Tarkanian, who last fall said he would welcome Ensign’s support, acknowledged his position would change if the Ensign matter became more serious.

In response, Lowden said she continues to believe Ensign’s troubles are between him and his family and colleagues.

“The investigation should be fair, unbiased and thorough so that any findings can bring clarity to Nevada voters and ultimate closure to this subject,” she said in a statement.

Tarkanian acknowledged concerns about whether Ensign can represent Nevada effectively given the current situation and said he does not plan to campaign with Ensign this fall.

He cited comments by Rep. Dean Heller, R-Nev., made on the Nevada NewsMakers program earlier this month about the difficulties the Nevada Congressional delegation has had in highlighting issues important to Nevada.

Heller said in part: “I think it has had an impact on our delegation as a whole and our ability to work together. I don’t have any problems working with Sen. Ensign. Sen. Ensign doesn’t have any problems working with me.”

But Heller said when Ensign is present at a press opportunity, the questions always revolve around his personal issues, not “what’s best for Nevada.”

Tarkanian said in a statement: “After consideration of the news reports and Congressman Heller’s recent statements – which I take very seriously – I think the issue is that the people of Nevada need to know that Senator Ensign can represent them effectively. This is a test Harry Reid has already failed repeatedly.”

“Realistically, I do not expect to be campaigning with Senator Ensign this fall,” he said. “I think Senator Ensign knows the focus of this campaign needs to stay where it belongs: on Harry Reid’s utter failure to represent the people of Nevada.”

Nevada GOP Calls Massachusetts Republican Senate Victory a Sign of Trouble for Reid, Obama – Reid to Push Forward on Economy, Health Care

By Sean Whaley | 1:34 pm January 20th, 2010

(Updated at 2:26 p.m. on Jan. 20, 2010)

CARSON CITY – Nevada State Republican Party Chairman Chris Comfort said today that the upset GOP victory in the U.S. Senate race in Massachusetts on Tuesday is a sign of a Renaissance for Republican candidates around the country and in Nevada.

It also means bad news for U.S. Sen. Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., both for his reelection campaign this year and his efforts to get health care legislation passed through Congress, he said.

The surprise victory is also a referendum on the performance of President Obama, who won Massachusetts by a huge margin in November 2008, Comfort said.

“Now we’ve seen a complete reversal,” he said in a conference call with reporters. “We do not envision them pulling out from this fast approaching trough, if you will.”

The victory of Scott Brown in the Massachusetts special election to replace the late Sen. Edward Kennedy means Democrats will no longer have the 60 votes needed to control debate and votes in the Senate.

Reid, in his response to the election, welcomed Brown to the Senate and said he will move to seat him as soon as the proper paperwork has been received. But even with the change in party dynamics, Senate Democrats will continue to work to strengthen the economy, create good-paying jobs and ensure Americans have access to affordable health care, he said.

“We hope that Scott Brown will join us in these efforts,” Reid said. “There is much work to do to address the problems Democrats inherited last year, and we plan to move full speed ahead.”

“Regardless of the size of their minority caucus, Senate Republicans have always had an obligation to join us in governing our nation through these difficult times,” he said. “[Tuesday’s] election doesn’t change that; in fact it is now more important than before for Republicans to work with us rather than against us if we are to find common ground that improves Americans’ lives.”

Several Nevada Republican candidates for the U.S. Senate seat held by Reid also weighed in on the election, urging Reid to seat Brown right away.

Concerns were this morning expressed by some Republicans that there may be a delay in seating Brown so Democrats could hold on to their 60-vote majority for as long as possible.

Candidate Sue Lowden, speaking at an event in Pahrump, said: “I call on Harry Reid to immediately seat (Brown) in the United States Senate so the people of Massachusetts have a voice and proper representation during these challenging times.”

Candidate John Chachas said of Brown’s victory: “The voters of Massachusetts have spoken in force today and their voice carries a message far beyond their own state borders. With the election victory of Scott Brown this evening all eyes now shift to Nevada’s Senator Harry Reid.”

Chachas also said Reid should seat Brown in the U.S. Senate in an expeditious manner, “so his voice and vote can be included in the national dialogue of important decisions…including healthcare.”

Candidate Danny Tarkanian said: “Tonight, the people of Massachusetts have spoken for the people of America, including the grassroots voters of Nevada right here:  ‘No more bailouts.  No more reckless spending.  No more socialized health care.  We’re taking our country back.’ ”

Jerry Stacy, speaking for candidate Sharron Angle, said the failure of President Obama and others to get the vote out for the Democratic candidate “has created a new concern for Harry Reid’s election strategy.”

Reid will keep campaigning as long as he can continue to raise huge amounts of money from lobbyists and special interests, but his leadership spells trouble for Democrats, Stacy said.

“This is certainly a clear message, and in of all states, to see this happen in the state of Massachusetts, it is certainly sending a wakeup call,” he said.

Comfort said the same traditional GOP positions used effectively by Brown are being pushed by Nevada’s many Republican candidates seeking the right to challenge Reid in the November general election.

“We have many candidates who are capable of taking the job from Harry Reid,” he said.

But the Nevada Republican Party’s number one focus will be jobs and the economy, Comfort said. The current state of the Nevada economy has created a lot of anxiety for Nevadans, many of whom will look to the Republican Party for leadership, including independents and conservative Democrats, Comfort said.

“Harry Reid is not listening,” he said. “Harry Reid has grown arrogant in his position, and therefore it is time for Harry Reid to leave and put somebody in there who understands the notion of what good governance is all about.”

Secretary of State Announces Improved Website

By Nevada News Bureau Staff | 1:09 pm January 20th, 2010

CARSON CITY – Secretary of State Ross Miller’s office announced today it has launched a new and improved website at www.nvsos.gov.

New features include an events calendar and an e-notification system that allows members of the public to sign up to receive email notices whenever new information of particular interest to them is posted to the site, including public meeting notices, special events and new services.

The subscribe and unsubscribe feature is accessible from the home page under e-notification and offers a menu of issues from which to choose.

The public can also access declarations of candidacy, financial disclosure statements and campaign contributions and expenditures reports. The documents can be found at the Election Center and searched by an individual’s or political committee’s name, or the entire list of documents submitted to date can be displayed.

The website also provides expanded online services for businesses. Businesses can apply for and receive their state business license online without an additional fee. The online applications are processed immediately.

The website now also includes a new searchable database that lists ministers licensed in Nevada. Minister licenses are issued at the county level, however, under state law, the Secretary of State is required to maintain a statewide database of permanently and temporarily licensed ministers. The public search provides only Permanent and Military ministers with an Active status.  Website users can query by name, church affiliation or county.

Secretary of State Ross Miller says he expects the number of site visitors to increase as more individuals and businesses from inside and outside of the state visit the new and improved website.

Nevada Group Proposes Increase in Mining Tax to Help with State Funding Woes

By Sean Whaley | 11:06 am January 19th, 2010

(Updated at 3:43 p.m. on Jan. 19, 2010)

RENO – A coalition of Nevada labor and social groups said today it will ask voters to raise the mining tax to help fund a state budget gap that continues to widen during the current economic slowdown.

PLAN, the Progressive Leadership Alliance of Nevada,  filed a petition with the Nevada Secretary of State’s office  to amend the state constitution to require taxes to be paid on the gross, not the net, of the value of the minerals extracted by the mining industry.

If approved by voters in 2010 and again in 2012, the effect of the change would be to more than triple the amount paid by the industry to  state and local governments, said PLAN Executive Director Bob Fulkerson.

The proposal would also allow the Legislature to increase the rate paid by the industry above the current limit of 5 percent, he said. The group has until June 15 to collect the 97,002 signatures needed to qualify the measure for the ballot.

A mining industry representative said looking to one industry to solve the state’s budget problems has not worked with the gaming industry and won’t work with mining either.

Fulkerson said mining is singled out for protections in the state constitution limiting the amount the industry must pay to the state, so it is fair game for being singled out for a tax increase.

“No other industry has a constitutional protection but mining,” he said. “It is unlike other industries. You can play another hand of cards, or sell another car or build another house. With gold, when you take it out of the ground it is gone for good. We’re just asking the mining industry to pay its fair share.”

The alternatives of increasing class sizes and ending all-day kindergarten, as proposed by Gov. Jim Gibbons as ways to balance the budget, are not acceptable, Fulkerson said.

Tim Crowley, president of the Nevada Mining Association, said the industry already pays its fair share. The industry in 2008 paid $130 million in conventional taxes, such as sales and payroll taxes, which was a record, he said.

The industry also pays the special mining tax of 5 percent on the value of the minerals, which also generated a record amount in 2008 of $92 million, he said.

“We haven’t seen the initiative, and we will have to take a hard look at how it would apply to our industry,” Crowley said.

Some less profitable non-gold producing mining companies could be hit harder with the proposed tax increase, he said.

Singling out one industry for a tax increase has been shown to be a bad idea in the past, Crowley said. Mining is also a bright spot in the state economy in this period of recession, he said.

“We’re providing high paying jobs to 14,000 Nevadans,” Crowley said. “To pick any industry, especially one that is already paying an industry specific tax, is not wise tax policy.”

State Sen. Randolph Townsend, R-Reno, said he is always reluctant to see changes proposed to the state consitution.

“As hard as it is to get something into the constitution, it is twice as hard to get it out,” he said. “What is popular now may not be popular a few years from now.”

Townsend said the state needs to examine how it spends its existing revenues before seeking a tax increase.

“The question is, do we need the revenue,” he said. “Before we ask someone to pay more, we have to ask ourselves if we are spending our current revenues effectively. The answer to that is: not completely.”

Sandoval Offers Budget Plan for Nevada

By Elizabeth Crum | 3:05 pm January 13th, 2010

LAS VEGAS — Gubernatorial candidate Brian Sandoval today announced his plan to address the state’s current budget shortfall.

Sandoval’s plan proposes temporary 4% salary reductions for all state employees including K-12 education personnel, state health plan modifications, privatizing selected state services and targeted budget cuts.  Sandoval’s plan aims to realize a savings of between $200 and $500 million.

Sandoval’s plan for the Public Employee Benefits Program (PEBS) would implement the four proposed SAGE Commission recommended 2009 PEBS reforms which are:

1) Immediately change employer contribution to 75% from 95%,

2) Eliminate subsidy for Medicare retirees beginning July 1, 2010,

3) Eliminate the entire subsidy for anyone who retires after July 1, 2010,

4) Reduce subsidy for non-Medicare retirees by 25% on July 1, 2010, and by 25% more on July 1, 2011

The proposal for privatization of selected state services would occur through a public bidding process.  Sandoval’s plan assumes an average savings of 10 percent for services including prison medical services, building and grounds maintenance, the state motor pool, mail services, and the state personnel and purchasing departments.

In addition, Sandoval’s proposal would divert $110 million from the Clark County School District portion of the state class size reduction program to the state general fund.  The temporary diversion would be offset by seeking statutory changes necessary to allow, on a temporary basis, the district to utilize its capital account reserves for operating expenses, salaries and program integrity.

“All Nevadans are facing tough times and our state budget is experiencing unprecedented deficits,” Sandoval said. “Revenues are down significantly, caseloads are up, and tough decisions will have to be made to keep our state solvent.”

“I understand the impact of these proposed salary and benefit reductions on our state employees, but I believe these reductions are a better alternative than mass layoffs, tax increases, or deficit spending,” he said.

“Make no mistake, there is a difficult road ahead and none of the choices to address this problem are easy or painless,” Sandoval said.

“Given the importance of this issue, I have studied the problem for months, enlisted the best and brightest minds in our state to aid me, and offer this plan as means to help our current leaders in their efforts to shore up our ailing state budget,” he said.

View or download a PDF of Sandoval’s plan here.